Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |

Thomas Gore
Black Dawn Rising
176
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 07:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
God I thought I hated EVE resources being taken for DUST development, but it seems I was very conservative after all.
oldbutfeelingyoung you are one bitter man. |

Thomas Gore
Black Dawn Rising
177
|
Posted - 2013.01.09 13:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
Rawk Chick wrote:WIS is a stupid waste of time and resources...
Thanks for your valuable input. Now back into your cave!
|

Thomas Gore
Black Dawn Rising
216
|
Posted - 2013.01.14 12:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ghazu wrote:Immersion is not content, and not that really important in the long run.
Now that's your opinion.
And it's also the wrong one.
|

Thomas Gore
Black Dawn Rising
216
|
Posted - 2013.01.14 12:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ghazu wrote:I'll tell you what's wrong, a bunch of dudes emoting each other.
You have quite a narrow view of emoting.
Besides I'm not the dude playing a female avatar... |

Thomas Gore
Black Dawn Rising
216
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 08:42:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ghazu wrote:No seriously tell me about this fascinating dudes emoting each other in a pretend-bar drinking pretend-drinks, like lol I've got drinking V I can handle 50 shots and my screen aint even blurry? I mean it just sounds pretty useless.
Usefulness was not on the table here, was it? It's a way to pass time. Good as any if you're stuck in the station anyway (waiting for an operation to start, being camped to hell, etc.) Add some minigames like poker, etc. and you've even further there. And a poker game vould actually serve as a gameplay element aswell, if you could bet ISK.
But don't get me wrong. If they added virtual bars and stuff BEFORE they added some WiS with actual meaningful gameplay (exploration, boarding actions, etc.) then I would agree they got their priorities right.
But after the framework is there, adding the bars is really not that much work.
|

Thomas Gore
Black Dawn Rising
216
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 09:51:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ghazu wrote:Thomas Gore wrote:Ghazu wrote:No seriously tell me about this fascinating dudes emoting each other in a pretend-bar drinking pretend-drinks, like lol I've got drinking V I can handle 50 shots and my screen aint even blurry? I mean it just sounds pretty useless. Usefulness was not on the table here, was it? It's a way to pass time. Good as any if you're stuck in the station anyway (waiting for an operation to start, being camped to hell, etc.) Add some minigames like poker, etc. and you're even further there. And a poker game vould actually serve as a gameplay element aswell, if you could bet ISK. But don't get me wrong. If they added virtual bars and stuff BEFORE they added some WiS with actual meaningful gameplay (exploration, boarding actions, etc.) then I would agree they got their priorities wrong. But after the framework is there, adding the bars is really not that much work. So we agree that it's pretty much useless. Usually, I just alt tab and wait for the call on the no-chatter channel. I agree with your prioritization.
Indeed. As you agree there is a lot of "downtime" in EVE, where you are just waiting for things to happen. This "virtual bar" could help to ease that problem, so in that sense it would not be totally "useless", although the impact to the numbers on your wallet/killboard/skills would be minimal.
Where it would be useful, however, is to attract more people to EVE. You would be surprised how many would be happy with just this virtual reality chatroom. I, as stated, would not be happy with just that, but would welcome it along other avatar gameplay mechanics. |

Thomas Gore
Black Dawn Rising
216
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 10:37:00 -
[7] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Arduemont wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Maths stuff. All that math is equally applicable to any development time spent on any area of the game. Ultimately what it comes down to is whether people want what the dev time is being spent on, and how much they want it. That's pretty much it. It's basically a question of popular of demand, and it has been obvious for quite some time that people really do want WiS. By this logic, if people want it who are already paying for the game without it then the development time was wasted. Also, I believe such claims of "popular demand" for what essentially amount to dance clubs in Eve Online may be somewhat overstated. Too say the least.
I believe otherwise. CCP underestimates the draw of avatar gameplay, because their current playerbase is mostly interested in FiS. Well duh! Their current playerbase would not exist if they were not interested in FiS, because that's all there is to EVE at the moment.
Avatar gameplay would first and foremost attract more new players to EVE. A lot of the current playerbase would be happy too. Unfortunately, CCP apparently does not believe in the draw of avatar gameplay. Maybe they have done some market research, maybe they are just listening to the ravings of their FiS fanatics.
Sadly, it seems CCP is putting resources into title like DUST and WoD. If all those resources would have been put to WiS instead, we would now have meaningful WiS AND the changes we have got to FiS in the meantime.
|

Thomas Gore
Black Dawn Rising
223
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 13:17:00 -
[8] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:The draw of 'Avatar Gameplay' to would-be new players is lessened by the fact that it means Eve no longer stands out from the crowd so much. Imagine you're a gamer who's never played an MMO before and you're looking through some gaming website for one to dip your toe in the water with. Row after row of screenshots featuring humanoid avatars with swords or guns or magic wands... and then there's that one with the gigantic spaceships and asteroid belts and laser cannons. Maybe this appeals, maybe it doesn't, but it definitely stands out as something distinct from the rest. Replace that screenshot with one of a humanoid avatar walking around a space station, and the new player just lumps it in with KOTOR and STO only without the recognised IP advantage.
A good part of my scepticism towards the whole WiS project is that is has an uneasy feel of CCP following the crowd rather than innovating. I hope there wasn't some board meeting where senior management said "Everyone else has humanoid avatar characters, we need to follow suit", but I can't be sure. The fact that CCP then tried to lump it in with following the crowd with micro-transaction cash shops (surrounded by some CCPers outright saying that they needed to look at micro-transactions because everyone else was and they needed to go along with it) just reinforces the thought.
Well yes clearly it would fall to the responsibility of the marketing dept to make sure they still get the message through: EVE is a spaceship game WITH avatar gameplay - not the other way around.
And I do share some of your scepticism, based on what CCP has shown us so far. Still, I can't help to feel anxious when I think of the new possibilities that could be opened with Avatar Gameplay - when done properly. A good part of my scepticism is directed to whether or not CCP actually has the skill in-house to make this happen. The dev responses in this thread claim they do have the know-how and only lack the resources. Which leads me to believe the management does not believe in Avatar Gameplay, as I said before.
|

Thomas Gore
Black Dawn Rising
223
|
Posted - 2013.01.16 08:18:00 -
[9] - Quote
I'll just add my final words in this debate.
CCP needs to add something to EVE. And by adding I mean a whole new gameplay element. Be it Avatar Gameplay, be it something else, but it needs to be an addition and not tweaks and fixes, like the three last "expansions".
And they need to add them soon, within the next couple of years. Competition (whether or not it's direct) is knocking on the door. Several developers are "stealing" ideas from EVE and at least promising to deliver much more than just FiS, and if all CCP can come up with is lame orbital bombardment and tiericide, they will be in trouble.
|

Thomas Gore
Blackfyre Enterprise
234
|
Posted - 2013.01.18 13:25:00 -
[10] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:Qvar Dar'Zanar wrote: So? Did people stop talking at all in the forums after the Incarna release? Were they abduced by Sansha, and angry anti-WiS zombies placed in their stead?
No they didn't. And for a long time objection and praise for Avatar content have been roughly 50/50. Times change though, and now with the greed is good and $80 manacle massacre a distant memory, as far as I can tell, there is a strong majority in favour of Avatar based content. Most of the objections you hear now are from people trying to make sure that if it does happen that it wont be just dressing up dolls and emoting to each other with no actual content linking it to the Eve universe. Which is where CCPs ideas for Avatar based wreckage exploration comes in. I don't think anyone really objects to that, because it's a fantastic idea. Even the most hardcore of anti-Avatar content posters can't find a good reason to say no to that. I do feel as though there is something we should be doing to grab CCPs attention. "I'll get to it later" is something we've been hearing from CCP since 2006, and frankly, if we keep letting them say it, we will never get the content they have very close to promised us. The popularity of the issue must be obvious to CCP, they can't be that ignorant, so now we have to show that this majority is willing to do something about it. Something needs to happen.
Good post. I agree with almost everything.
As I've said before, CCP has got two, maybe three years to come up with something really new in their game or competition will go zooming past them like an interceptor racing a hulk.
|

Thomas Gore
Blackfyre Enterprise
241
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 16:59:00 -
[11] - Quote
Competition will come in the form of an open-world sandbox experience. Whether it will be Star Citizen, Elite, Pathfinder Online or Everquest Next does not matter. Sooner or later one dev will get it right, and it will be a massive loss for EVE.
But as I said before. CCP still holds all the cards. They have the game already, they just need to expand it. They've got the time. Just need to stop exploring stupid sidepaths like console shooters and vampire games. Stuff like that cannot keep leeching on EVE developer and funding resource base much longer.
We are paying for them to keep EVE developing at a good pace. Frankly, I cannot say the last three expansions have been a good pace.
|

Thomas Gore
Blackfyre Enterprise
241
|
Posted - 2013.01.20 11:20:00 -
[12] - Quote
arcca jeth wrote:Sura Sadiva wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:[quote=Vera Algaert] I couldn't care less if it's spaceships, ogres, smurfs or even pink ponies.
What matters the most is the ruthless pvp centric sandbox. I think this is true for a larger part of palyers. We are here cause it's a persistent universe sandbox more than for the sci-fi setting. Then if somoene is also a sci-fi fan this is an added plus but not a decisive element in case of competition. I'm a big sci-fi fan. However if tomorrow they say "we releasing a modern version of Ultima online" or a sandbox eve-style with fantasy setting I think I'd go there. Also because I'm sure in that case I could bring all my old group of friends. Thing that I cannot do with EvE. They did make one and it hasn't done too well it's called Mortal Online so the CSM is WRONG
The reason MO didn't do well had nothing to do with it's concepts (which were amazing) and everything to do with excecution (which was and still is horrible). It's like UO with ****** 3D graphics and one percent of the content.
|

Thomas Gore
Blackfyre Enterprise
247
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 06:42:00 -
[13] - Quote
Lothix VSX wrote:I'm perplexed as to why CCP added a solo captain quarters experience, a clothing store to go with it but then decided not to add the interactive social experience of actually walking out of the quarters and interacting with other players. How could the potential or success of WiS be evaluated when WiS was never properly implemented? CCP just half-assed WiS and then gave up on it.
Well their implementation was crap, took way too long time and was bundled up with a shameless cash grab scheme, so it's no wonder the customers went apeshit. CCP was dropped down from their clouds and now they are afraid of trying anything similar, because they think it's the WiS itself people were angry about.
|

Thomas Gore
Blackfyre Enterprise
247
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 09:21:00 -
[14] - Quote
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote: It would be easier if they knew what to do and what to say about it, becasue it pretty much looks like they painted themselves in a corner. EVE is a spaceships game and they wouldn't be able to develop it further throguh avatars even if they figured or wanted to.
Just they don't dare to say it openly. Remove the CQ, the NEx and evertyhing but the bare character creator delivered with Incursion. If they won't make it, then should break it and stop the pain.
I tend to agree, but keep on hoping :)
Might turn out to be a fool's hope and I wholeheartedly agree that CCP will need to step in and say "YES we are developing WiS and it will be implemented in 201x" or "NO we are not developing WiS and probably never will, eat your spaceship game and shut the **** up!" |

Thomas Gore
Blackfyre Enterprise
248
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 11:03:00 -
[15] - Quote
Ghazu wrote:well basically, CCP indicated that all you emote lovers are SOL, until they come up with some content, after dust gets off the ground.
I think the real issue here is that they have not stated if they will bring WiS with content out ever.
|

Thomas Gore
Blackfyre Enterprise
249
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 13:10:00 -
[16] - Quote
Bagrat Skalski wrote:Quote:"NO we are not developing WiS and probably never will, eat your spaceship game and shut the **** up!" They have said something similar many times. Problem is, people don't want to believe it. Like with POS overhaul. CCP did't promised anything after all. It was a presentation on fanfest, where they made their marketing magic with PowerPoint and everyone was like "POS overhaul - CCP is thinking/prototyping/developing/finishing it". You just made this hype, because it was what you wished for, and it was needed by you, but CCP was just like always.
Please read the dev posts in this message and you will see CCP really does not know where they stand with WiS at the moment, or at least are not letting us know where they stand. |
|
|